Potential of Areca Nuts as Raw Materials for Sustainable Industry: A Comprehensive Review and Future Directions
Abstract
This investigation explores the utilization of clustering techniques within the realm of sustainable agroindustrial discourse to categorize temporal relationships and innovations in the existing literature. Employing a systematic literature review (SLR) methodology, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework, this research concentrates on environmental sustainability and economic viability. The study emphasizes the necessity of a comprehensive approach that amalgamates technological, economic, and environmental considerations to evaluate the areca palm's potential as an industrial resource. Central to this inquiry is the environmental sustainability associated with areca nut production and utilization, aiming to uncover its novelty as an industrial crop. Furthermore, this research illuminates the relevance of contemporary publications and influential scholars in the field, offering insights into prominent research trajectories, seminal works, and prospective areas for future exploration. The study juxtaposes various sustainable agroindustrial research methodologies, including environmental life cycle assessment (E-LCA), social life cycle assessment (S-LCA), cost life cycle assessment (C-LCA), and life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA). A detailed account of the SLR process is provided, encompassing the initial literature search, selection parameters, and the utilization of diverse scientific databases to amass 650 comprehensive publications. By investigating the areca nut's potential as a sustainable industrial raw material, this study addresses a gap in the literature and furnishes valuable insights for policymakers, practitioners, and academics engaged in sustainable agro-industrial practices. Consequently, this research makes a substantial contribution to the understanding of areca nut's viability as a sustainable resource in agroindustrial applications.
Keywords: areca nut; agroindustry; sustainability; raw material
DOI:10.62321/issn.1000-1298.2024.10.07
Download Full Text:
PDFReferences
MEHRTASH H, DUNCAN K, PARASCANDOLA M, et al. Defining a global research and policy agenda for betel quid and areca nut. The Lancet Oncology, 2017, 18(12), e767–e775.
YUDAPUTRA A, ZULKARNAEN R N, WANDA I F, et al. Flowering of Areca catechu in Bogor Botanic Gardens. Berkala Penelitian Hayati, 2017, 22(1), 32–37.
ARORA S, SQUIER C. Areca nut trade, globalisation and its health impact: perspectives from India and South-east Asia. Perspectives in Public Health, 2018, 139(1), 44–48.
CHIU C-T, LIN C-Y, YEN C-Y, et al. Mechanistic and compositional studies of the autophagy-inducing areca nut ingredient. Journal of Dental Sciences, 2020, 15(4), 526–535.
LIU Y-J, PENG W, HU M-B, et al. The pharmacology, toxicology and potential applications of arecoline: a review. Pharmaceutical Biology, 2016, 54(11), 2753–2760.
LI Y-C, CHENG A-J, LEE L-Y, et al. Multifaceted mechanisms of areca nuts in oral carcinogenesis: the molecular pathology from precancerous condition to malignant transformation. Journal of Cancer, 2019, 10(17), 4054–4062.
DAI J, TANG W, ZHANG J, et al. Determination and quality evaluation of active ingredients in areca nut using near-infrared rapid detection technology. Microchemical Journal, 2023, 196, 109586.
GARG K, KUMAR A, KIZHAKKETHIL V, et al. Overlap in oncogenic and pro-inflammatory pathways associated with areca nut and nicotine exposure. Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy, 2024, 2(3), 187–194.
HUANG J, WEN Y, YANG T, et al. Safety and efficacy evaluation of Simo decoction and Arecae semen in herbal medicine practice. Heliyon, 2024, 10(11), e31373.
MOHAMED S. Functional foods against metabolic syndrome (obesity, diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia) and cardiovasular disease. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2013, 35(2), 114–128.
SALEHI B, KONOVALOV D A, FRU P, et al. Areca catechu—from farm to food and biomedical applications. Phytotherapy Research, 2020, 34(9), 2140–2158.
ABBAS G, KASHIF M, MUDASSAR, et al. Cytotoxic, embryotoxic, insecticidal and anti-microbial activities of standardized Areca catechu nut. Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2018, 31(2), 385–392.
FOGLIATTI D P, KEMPPAINEN S A, KALNES T N, et al. Life cycle carbon footprint of linear alkylbenzenesulfonate from coconut oil, palm kernel oil, and petroleum-based paraffins. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2014, 2(7), 1828–1834.
KARIMAH A, RIDHO M R, MUNAWAR S S, et al. A comprehensive review on natural fibers: technological and socio-economical aspects. Polymers, 2021, 13(24), 4280.
ELLILI N O D. Bibliometric analysis of sustainability papers: evidence from environment, development and sustainability. Environment Development and Sustainability, 2023, 26(4), 8183–8209.
SUN H, YU W, LI H, et al. Bioactive components of areca nut: an overview of their positive impacts targeting different organs. Nutrients, 2024, 16(5), 695.
GUJRE N, MITRA S, AGNIHOTRI R, et al. Novel agrotechnological intervention for soil amendment through areca nut husk biochar in conjunction with vetiver grass. Chemosphere, 2021, 287, 132443.
YUAN J, ZHANG H, ZHAO H, et al. Study on dissociation and chemical structural characteristics of areca nut husk. Molecules, 2023, 28(3), 1513.
HAUSCHILD M Z, ROSENBAUM R K, OLSEN S I. (eds.) Life cycle assessment: theory and practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018.
OLALEKAN E I, EMILY I, TOHEEB J, et al. Life cycle sustainability assessment. In: IDOWU S, SCHMIDPETER R, CAPALDI N. (eds.) Encyclopedia of sustainable management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023: 1–11.
LUTHIN A, TRAVERSO M, CRAWFORD R H. Circular life cycle sustainability assessment: an integrated framework. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2023, 28(1), 41–58.
TONIOLO S, TOSATO R C, GAMBARO F, et al. Life cycle thinking tools: life cycle assessment, life cycle costing and social life cycle assessment. In: REN J, TONIOLO S. (eds.) Life cycle sustainability assessment for decision-making: methodologies and case studies. Elsevier, 2020: 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818355-7.00003-8
BASTIANONI S, GOFFETTI G, NERI E, et al. LCA based circularity indices of systems at different scales: a holistic approach. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 897, 165245.
DONG Y, MIRAGLIA S, MANZO S, et al. Environmental sustainable decision making – the need and obstacles for integration of LCA into decision analysis. Environmental Science & Policy, 2018, 87, 33–44.
RUFÍ-SALÍS M, PETIT-BOIX A, VILLALBA G, et al. Combining LCA and circularity assessments in complex production systems: the case of urban agriculture. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 2020, 166, 105359.
D’EUSANIO M, LEHMANN A, ZAMAGNI A, et al. How experiences and existing data of companies can be used to define the goal and scope in a social organisational life cycle assessment (SO-LCA). In: Pre-proceedings of the 6th Social Life Cycle Assessment Conference “People and Places for Partnership”, 10–12 September 2018; Pescara, 2018: 208–214.
RÖDGER J M, KJÆR L L, PAGOROPOULOS A. Life cycle costing: an introduction. In: HAUSCHILD M Z, ROSENBAUM R K, OLSEN S I. (eds.) Life cycle assessment. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018: 373–399.
ANGELIA D, SURYANINGSIH R. The effect of environmental performance and corporate social responsibility disclosure towards financial performance (case study to manufacture, infrastructure, and service companies that listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, 211, 348–355.
MARTINHO V J P D. Life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA): comparing outputs for bibliographic coupling and citation links. Heliyon, 2023, 9(11), e21182.
KERDLAP P, CORNAGO S. Life cycle costing: methodology and applications in a circular economy. In: LIU L, RAMAKRISHNA S. (eds.) An introduction to circular economy. Singapore: Springer, 2021: 499–525.
COSTA D, QUINTEIRO P, DIAS A C. A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 686, 774–787.
DE MENNA F, DIETERSHAGEN J, LOUBIERE M, et al. Life cycle costing of food waste: a review of methodological approaches. Waste Management, 2018, 73, 1–13.
MUKHERJEE P K, DAS B, BHARDWAJ P K, et al. Socio-economic sustainability with circular economy — an alternative approach. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 904, 166630.
CHIARALUCE G. Circular economy in the agri-food sector: a policy overview. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 2021, 76(3), 53–60.
BACKES J G, TRAVERSO M. Application of life cycle sustainability assessment in the construction sector: a systematic literature review. Processes, 2021, 9(7), 1248.
YANG W, ANH B, LE P. Do consumers care about environmentally sustainable attributes along the food supply chain? — a systematic literature review. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2), 513–533.
SILVESTRI C, SILVESTRI L, PICCAROZZI M, et al. Toward a framework for selecting indicators of measuring sustainability and circular economy in the agri-food sector: a systematic literature review. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2022, 29(8), 1446–1484.
WARDANU A, INDRASTI N, SUPRIHATIN N. Green synthesis of silica nanoparticles (Si-NPs) from palm oil fuel ash (POFA) and its application to purification water: a review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2024, 1358, 012015.
YUSIANTO R, SUPRIHATIN S, HARDJOMIDJOJO H, et al. Sustainable environmental management system in food crop agriculture in Wonosobo District, Indonesia. Research Square, 2021. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-962754/v1
SATRIA H, NOVIANDRI D, SUSWATI, et al. Stability of an integrated power supply in a PV/grid network for an IoT system-based BSF maggot farming monitoring controller. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Machinery, 2023, 54(12), 1–9.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.