Growth Response of Indigenous Arrowroot (Maranta Arundinacea L.) at Four Shading Levels and Seven Watering Intervals

Sutrisno, Eko Sulistyono, Edi Santosa, Eriyanto Yusnawan

Abstract

Arrowroot is a shade-tolerant crop; however, there is limited information on its tolerance to waterlogging and drought stress. This study determines the response of indigenous arrowroot growth to waterlogging and drought stress under shading conditions. This research was conducted at Jambegede Research Station, Ministry of Agriculture, Malang, Indonesia, from September 2022 to March 2023. The experiment consisted of shading intensity as the main plot and water treatment as a subplot. The shading intensity consisted of four levels (0, 25, 50, and 75%). The water treatment consisted of seven levels (15, 10, and 5 days of waterlogging; 5 days (control), 10, 15, and 20 days of watering interval). The treatments were arranged in a split-plot in a completely randomized block design with three replications. The results showed that shading stress (25–75%) and watering intervals (15 days of waterlogging and watering every 20 days) suppressed the vegetative and generative growth of arrowroot. Shading stress influenced the number of mature roots, root length, root weight, root volume, stem weight, stem diameter, leaf weight, and leaf area. Watering stress influenced the number of mature and adventitious roots, plant height, stem weight, leaf number, leaf fresh weight, total leaf area, tuber weight, and biomass weight. The fluctuation of the leaf pigment content influenced the tuber weight. Waterlogging for 15 days reduced the tuber fresh weight, whereas watering every 20 days showed vegetative growth and tuber fresh weight similar to those of the control plants. Arrowroot plants were more tolerant to drought than waterlogging; therefore, these plants were suitable for cultivation under shading in marginal lands with limited water supply.  

 

Keywords: arrowroot; chlorophyll; drought; shading; tuber yield; waterlogging; water stress

 

DOI:10.62321/issn.1000-1298.2023.10.01


Download Full Text:

PDF


References


WAHJUNINGSIH S B, SUSANTI S. Chemical, physical, and sensory characteristics of analog rice developed from the mocaf, arrowroof, and red bean flour. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 102, 012015.

MAHARANI D, SUDOMO A, SWESTIANI D, et al. Intercropping tuber crops with teak in Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Agronomy, 2022, 12(2), 449.

OKTAFANI M B, SUPRIYONO, BUDIASTUTI M S, et al. Performance of arrowroot (Marantha arundinacea) in various light intensities. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 142, 102048.

SUPRIYONO S, PUTRI R B A, WIJAYANTI R. Analisis pertumbuhan garut (Marantha arundinaceae) pada beberapa tingkat naungan. Agrosains: Jurnal Penelitian Agronomi, 2017, 19, 22–27.

HAN H, PAN R, BUITRAGO S, et al. The physiological basis of genotypic variations in low-oxygen stress tolerance in the vegetable sweet potato. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2021, 68, 1236–1246.

YUNIATI N, HAMDANI J S, SOLEH M A. Respons fisiologis tanaman kentang terhadap jenis zat pengatur tumbuh pada berbagai kondisi cekaman kekeringan di dataran medium. Jurnal Kultivasi, 2020, 19(1), 1053–1060.

ZHANG Y, LIU G, DONG H, et al. Waterlogging stress in cotton: damage, adaptability, alleviation strategies, and mechanisms. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(2), 257–270.

YAMAUCHI T, ABE F, TSUTSUMI N, et al. Root cortex provides a venue for gas-space formation and is essential for plant adaptation to waterlogging. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10, 259.

MASOUMI Z, HAGHIGHI M, JALALI S. Flooding or drought which one is more offensive on pepper physiology and growth. Molecular Biology Reports, 2021, 48, 4233–4245.

IDE R, ICHIKI A, SUZUKI T. Analysis of yield reduction factors in processing tomatoes under waterlogging conditions. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 295, 110840.

HUANG C, GAO Y, QIN A, et al. Effects of waterlogging at different stages and durations on maize growth and grain yields. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 261, 107334.

LUAN H, GUO B, PAN Y, et al. Morpho-anatomical and physiological responses to waterlogging stress in different barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes. Plant Growth Regulation, 2018, 85, 399–409.

AHMED Z G, EL-SAYED M A. Influence of drought stress on physiological traits of crossed okra varieties. Jordan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2021, 14(2), 253–260.

ZHANG H, DUAN W, XIE B, et al. Root yield, antioxidant capacities, and hormone contents in different drought-tolerant sweet potato cultivars treated with ABA under early drought stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2020, 42, 132.

SARI H P, IHSAN M, WIDIASTUTI L, et al. Pengaruh lama penggenangan terhadap pertumbuhan beberapa varietas tanaman tomat (Lycopersicum esculentum). AGRIEKSTENSIA: Jurnal Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pertanian, 2021, 20(1), 16–26.

PARK S U, LEE C J, KIM S E, et al. Selection of flooding stress tolerant sweetpotato cultivars based on biochemical and phenotypic characterization. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2020, 155, 243–251.

SATHI K S, MASUD A A C, FALGUNI M R, et al. Screening of soybean genotypes for waterlogging stress tolerance and understanding the physiological mechanisms. Advances in Agriculture, 2022, 2022, 5544665.

KERDDEE S, KONGSIL P, NAKASATHIEN S. Waterlogging tolerance and recovery in canopy development stage of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science, 2021, 43(2), 233–244.

GABALLAH M M, GHONEIM A M, GHAZY M I, et al. Root traits responses to irrigation intervals in rice (Oryza sativa). International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2021, 26, 22–30.

NURAINI A, SOEDJANAATMADJA U, KARUNIAWAN A. Yield and yield quality characteristics of two varieties of sweet potato under different watering intervals. Research on Crops, 2023, 24, 149–157.

HIDAYATULLAH C S R, SANTOSA E, SOPANDIE D. Respon genotipe talas colocasia esculenta var esculenta dan var antiquorum pada interval pemberian air berbeda. Indonesian Journal of Agronomy, 2020, 48, 249–257.

CHEN H, LI Q P, ZENG Y L, et al. Effect of different shading materials on grain yield and quality of rice. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9, 9992.

QI D, PAN C. Responses of shoot biomass accumulation, distribution, and nitrogen use efficiency of maize to nitrogen application rates under waterlogging. Agricultural Water Management, 2022, 261, 107352.

PARK W, CHUNG M N, NAM S S, et al. Evaluation of the growth and yield of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) at different growth stages under low light intensity. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 2021, 66, 146–154.

NGUYEN L V, LE T M, TA P D V, et al. Variation in root growth responses of sweet potato to hypoxia and waterlogging. Vegetos, 2020, 33, 367–375.

GOUVEIA C S S, GANANÇA J F T, DE NÓBREGA H G M, et al. Phenotypic flexibility and drought avoidance in taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott). Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 2020, 32(2), 150–159.

ZHAO T, PAN X, OU Z, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of waterlogging tolerance of eleven Canna cultivars at flowering stage. Scientia Horticulturae, 2022, 296, 110890.

LICHTENTHALER H K, BUSHMANN C. Chlorophylls and carotenoids: measurement and characterization by UV-VIS spectroscopy. Current Protocols in Food Analytical Chemistry, 2001, Supplement 1, F4.3.1–F4.3.8.

FAN Y, CHEN J, CHENG Y, et al. Effect of shading and light recovery on the growth, leaf structure, and photosynthetic performance of soybean in a maize-soybean relay-strip intercropping system. PLoS ONE, 2018, 13, e0198159.

GONDIM A R D O, PUIATTI M, FINGER F L, et al. Artificial shading promotes growth of taro plants. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, 2018, 48(2), 83–89.

HUSSAIN S, IQBAL N, RAHMAN T, et al. Shade effect on carbohydrates dynamics and stem strength of soybean genotypes. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2019, 162, 374–382.

ZHOU T, LI W, YANG H, et al. Ameliorated light conditions increase the P uptake capability of soybean in a relay-strip intercropping system by altering root morphology and physiology in the areas with low solar radiation. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 688, 1069–1080.

HUSSAIN S, IQBAL N, BRESTIC M, et al. Changes in morphology, chlorophyll fluorescence performance and Rubisco activity of soybean in response to foliar application of ionic titanium under normal light and shade environment. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 658, 626–637.

GELDEREN K V, KANG C, PIERIK R. Light signaling, root development, and plasticity. Plant Physiology, 2018, 176, 1049–1060.

ABIKO T, MIYASAKA S C. Aerenchyma and barrier to radial oxygen loss are formed in roots of Taro (Colocasia esculenta) propagules under flooded conditions. Journal of Plant Research, 2020, 133, 49–56.

ZENG R, CHEN L, WANG X, et al. Effect of waterlogging stress on dry matter accumulation, photosynthesis characteristics, yield, and yield components in three different ecotypes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Agronomy, 2020, 10(9), 1244.

MOURTALA I Z M, OSELEBE H O, BAINA D J, et al. Selection of new sweetpotato hybrids for West Africa using accelerated breeding scheme and genotype × environment interaction under drought stress. Scientific Reports, 2023, 13, 6489.

ZHANG G, SHEN D, MING B, et al. Using irrigation intervals to optimize water-use efficiency and maize yield in Xinjiang, northwest China. The Crop Journal, 2019, 7, 322–334.

PENG J, FENG Y, WANG X, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on the photosynthetic pigment, leaf fluorescence characteristics, and yield of indica hybrid rice and their interrelations. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11, 7485.

ZAYTSEVA I Y, NOSKOVA E N, LISITSYN E M, et al. Relationship of barley leaf’s

pigment content with development of yield structure elements. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 677, 042051.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.