Thematic Village Development Policy Model Based on Environmental, Social, and Economic Aspects as Part of Sustainable Development
Abstract
A thematic village is a style of village development that uses the resources that already exist in the area to improve the welfare of the community. The development of thematic villages can consider economic, social, and environmental factors. This paper examines thematic village development strategies as part of environmental, social, and economic sustainability. To gather information for this mixed method study, both qualitative and quantitative approaches were used, using field observation, interviews, and documentation study methods and quantitative with SEM analysis. The research findings show that the community’s desire to maintain and showcase the potential of the area and the human resources they have nurtured over the years while improving their economic conditions was the beginning of the creation of thematic villages. Collaborative urban planning and development provides communities with greater opportunities and space to participate in shaping the future of their city in ways to make it more vibrant, humane, and sustainable. The results of the SEM analysis indicate that realizing thematic villages toward sustainable development requires collaboration of community participation with technological innovations that can reduce environmental impacts.
Keywords: thematic village; development strategies; society participation
DOI:10.62321/issn.1000-1298.2023.11.04
Download Full Text:
PDFReferences
LEAL FILHO W, TRIPATHI S K, ANDRADE GUERRA J B S O D, et al. Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2019, 26(2), 179–190.
DONG Q, LIN Y, HUANG J, et al. Has urbanization accelerated PM2.5 emissions? An empirical analysis with cross-country data. China Economic Review, 2020, 59, 101381.
MAGINA F B, KYESSI A, KOMBE W. The urban land nexus– challenges and opportunities of regularising informal settlements: the case studies of Dar es Salaam and Mwanza in Tanzania. Journal of African Real Estate Research, 2020, 5(1), 32–54.
MARTUTI N K T, SETYOWATI D L, NUGRAHA S B, et al. Carbon stock potency of mangrove ecosystem at Tapak Sub-village, Semarang, Indonesia. AACL Bioflux, 2017, 10(6), 1524–1533.
MARKANTONI M, STEINER A, MEADOR J E, et al. Do community empowerment and enabling state policies work in practice? Insights from a community development intervention in rural Scotland. Geoforum, 2018, 97, 142–154.
HAUGHTON G. Environmental justice and the sustainable city. In: SATTERTHWAITE D. (ed.) The Earthscan reader in sustainable cities. London: Routledge, 2021: 62–79.
MCCAULEY D, RAMASAR V, HEFFRON R J, et al. Energy justice in the transition to low carbon energy systems: exploring key themes in interdisciplinary research. Applied Energy, 2019, 233, 916–921.
BEDNARSKA-OLEJNICZAK D, OLEJNICZAK J, SVOBODOVÁ L. Towards a smart and sustainable city with the involvement of public participation—the case of Wroclaw. Sustainability, 2019, 11(2), 332.
SUARDANA I W, GELGEL I P, WATRA I W. Traditional villages empowerment in local wisdom preservation towards cultural tourism development. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2022, 5(1), 74–81.
HUTABARAT P M. Music tourism potentials in Indonesia: music festivals and their roles in city branding. Journal of Indonesian Tourism and Policy Studies, 2022, 7(1), 44–54.
DE PAULA PEREIRA A S A, DOS SANTOS V J, DO CARMO ALVES S, et al. Contribution of rural settlements to the deforestation dynamics in the Legal Amazon. Land Use Policy, 2022, 115, 106039.
TURNER A. (ed.) The cities of the poor: settlement planning in developing countries. Routledge, 2021.
KHUDORI D. The altruism of Romo Mangun: the seed, the growth, the fruits. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Pondok Rakyat, 2002.
IRUNGU R W, LIU Z, LIU X, et al. Role of networks of rural innovation in advancing the sustainable development goals: a quadruple helix case study. Sustainability, 2023, 15(17), 13221.
HASAN M A, NAHIDUZZAMAN K M, ALDOSARY A S. Public participation in EIA: a comparative study of the projects run by government and non-governmental organizations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2018, 72, 12–24.
LEŚNIEWSKA-NAPIERAŁA K, NAPIERAŁA T, TOBIASZ-LIS P, et al. Sustainable tourism development towards spatial justice: evidence from Masłomęcz, Poland. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Future of Tourism: Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (Futourism 2019), 26–28 September 2019; Mersin: Mersin University, 2019: 407–410.
NAVARRO-VALVERDE F, LABIANCA M, CEJUDO-GARCÍA E, et al. Social innovation in rural areas of the European Union learnings from neo-endogenous development projects in Italy and Spain. Sustainability, 2022, 14(11), 6439.
PONTO H. The evaluation of affective domain learning outcome in students’ basic learning of electrical circuit in vocational education school. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, 2020, 17(2–3), 1222–1226.
UMAR H. Business an introduction. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.
MIKKELSEN B. Methods for development work and research: a new guide for practitioners. New Delhi: SAGE Publications, 2005.
RUDITO B, FAMIOLA M, ANGGAHEGARI P. Corporate social responsibility and social capital: journey of community engagement toward community empowerment program in developing country. Sustainability, 2022, 15(1), 466.
FOTIADIS A, YEH S S, HUAN T C T. Applying configural analysis to explaining rural-tourism success recipes. Journal of Business Research, 2016, 69(4), 1479–1483.
PESONEN J, KOMPPULA R. Rural wellbeing tourism: motivations and expectations. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 2010, 17(1), 150–157.
LÓPEZ-GUZMÁN T, SÁNCHEZ-CAÑIZARES S, PAVÓN V. Community-based tourism in developing countries: a case study. Tourismos, 2011, 6(1), 69–84.
BOUCHON F, RAWAT K. Rural areas of ASEAN and tourism services, a field for innovative solutions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, 224, 44–51.
CVAR N, TRILAR J, KOS A, et al. The use of IoT technology in smart cities and smart villages: similarities, differences, and future prospects. Sensors, 2020, 20(14), 3897.
ANWAR W A, MOSTAFA N S, HAKIM S A, et al. Health literacy co-design in a low resource setting: harnessing local wisdom to inform interventions across fishing villages in Egypt to improve health and equity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2021, 18(9), 4518.
KIRSCHKE P, SIETKO D. The function and potential of innovative reinforced concrete prefabrication technologies in achieving residential construction goals in Germany and Poland. Buildings, 2021, 11(11), 533.
GAN X, YAN K, WEN T. Using fuzzy cognitive maps to develop policy strategies for the development of green rural housing: a case study in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2023, 192, 122590.
JANKOVIC A, GOIA F. Impact of double skin facade constructional features on heat transfer and fluid dynamic behaviour. Building and Environment, 2021, 196, 107796.
SMITH J A, FIELDSEND M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis. American Psychological Association, 2021.
BUSTARD J R T, BOLAN P, DEVINE A, et al. The emerging smart event experience: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Tourism Review, 2019, 74(1), 116–128.
NEUBAUER B E, WITKOP C T, VARPIO L. How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 2019, 8, 90–97.
PALMER C, BOLDERSTON A. A brief introduction to qualitative research. Canadian Journal of Medical Radiation Technology, 2006, 37(1), 16–19.
BURGOYNE C, MEARNS K. Sustainable tourism/ecotourism. In: LEAL FILHO W, AZUL A M, BRANDLI L, et al. (eds.) Responsible consumption and production. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Cham: Springer, 2020: 817–825.
LISTYORINI H, SUPRIYANTO S, PRAYITNO P H, et al. Penguatan Kelembagaan Pokdarwis dalam Merintis Desa Wisata melalui Penciptaan Identitas dan Kapabilitas Perencanaan Organisasi. Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri, 2021, 5(2), 491–504.
PUTRO H P N, PUTRA M A H, ILHAMI M R, et al. Social interaction of riverside communities on river utilization in Banua Anyar Village. The Innovation of Social Studies Journal, 2022, 4(1), 46–52.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.