Do International Remittances Contribute to the Subjective Well-Being of Rural Households in Indonesia?

Fanny Widadie, Hery Toiba, Vonny Indah Mutiara, Moh Shadiqur Rahman, Cahyo Wisnu Rubiyanto, Cindy Paloma

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess how international remittances shape the subjective well-being of rural households in Indonesia, with an emphasis on the paired indicators of happiness and life satisfaction. This study describes a new empirical approach based on the conditional mixed process (CMP) framework, enabling the simultaneous modelling of a household’s probability of receiving remittances and the resulting well-being outcomes, while explicitly correcting for endogeneity and selection bias. Using household-level survey data from 600 rural families in East Java, Central Java, and West Sumatra, the authors demonstrate that remittances raise subjective well-being. Remittance-receiving households report, on average, a 0.42-point higher happiness score and a 0.37-point higher life-satisfaction score on a five-point scale (≈ 10–12 % relative gains). As an example, we illustrate the proposed technique by estimating heterogeneous effects across income tertiles; the happiness premium is concentrated among low- and middle-income groups, whereas life satisfaction gains accrue across all income strata. Our method allows researchers and practitioners to improve impact-estimation accuracy by simultaneously modelling receipt and outcome equations, reducing bias in marginal effect estimates by up to 20 % compared with single-equation logit or OLS specifications. The effectiveness of the evaluation procedure is confirmed by robustness calculations, including alternative instrument sets and placebo tests, all of which determine the direction and significance of the core remittance effects. These research results develop the literature on the non-monetary consequences of migration transfers, supplement welfare economics studies of rural Indonesia, and can be used by policymakers to design targeted financial-inclusion programs, gender-sensitive social protection, and productive investment schemes that magnify welfare returns from remittances. This study is novel because it applies a CMP strategy to the study of subjective well-being in a developing-country context, jointly identifies the determinants and impacts of remittances within a unified econometric architecture, and provides fine-grained distributional evidence that previous single-equation studies could not reveal.

 

Keywords: remittances; subjective well-being; rural households.

 

DOI:https://doi.org/10.62321/issn.1000-1298.2025.4.4

 

 

 

Download Full Text:

PDF


References


Dey S. Impact of Remittances on Labour Supply and Occupational Choice in Rural India. International Journal of Rural Management 2021;18:78–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973005221994371.

Statista. Value of personal remittances in Indonesia from 2004 to 2023, based on remittance outflow towards any other country 2025. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1076705/outgoing-remittance-from-indonesia/ (accessed March 7, 2025).

Richard H. Adams Jr, Cuecuecha A. The Economic Impact of International Remittances on Poverty and Household Consumption and Investment in Indonesia. Labor: Demographics & Economics of the Family EJournal 2010. https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-5433.

Nahar FH, Arshad M. EFFECTS OF REMITTANCES ON POVERTY REDUCTION: THE CASE OF INDONESIA. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business 2017;32:163–77. https://doi.org/10.22146/JIEB.28678.

Nyoni G, Kollamparambil U. Rural-urban migration and the well-being of the migrant-sending households: An impact evaluation study. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 2022. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v25i1.4120.

Joarder MAM, Harris MN, Dockery AM. Remittances and Happiness of Migrants and Their Home Households: Evidence Using Matched Samples. J Dev Stud 2017;53:422–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2016.1178380.

Naghdi Y, Amirtaemeh H, Kaghazian S. The Puzzle of Relationship between the Economic Growth and Happiness. Economic Analysis 2021;54:1–12. https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.21.54.1.pp1-12.

Jabbar JB. Effect of Remittances on Healthcare of Left-Behind Parents. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research 2024. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i06-46.

Jones R. Migration pessimism and the subjective well‐being of migrant households in Mexico. Bull Lat Am Res 2015;34:305–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/blar.12265.

Orozco M. Remittances and Well-Being, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-047163-1.00050-3.

Farooq H, Subhan S, Riaz Y. Impact of Foreign Remittances on Quality of Life: A Case Study of District Lower Dir, Pakistan. Global Social Sciences Review 2019. https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2019(iv-iii).17.

Shair W, Anwar M, Hussain S, Kubra N. The Differential Effect of Internal and External Remittances on Labor Participation and Employment Choices in Pakistan. Sage Open 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241265879.

Antia K, Boucsein J, Deckert A, Dambach P, Račaitė J, Šurkienė G, Jaenisch T, Horstick O, Winkler V. Impacts of international labor migration on the mental health and well-being of left-behind children. Eur J Public Health 2020;30. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.691.

Ivlevs A, Nikolova M, Graham C. Emigration, remittances, and the subjective well-being of those staying behind. J Popul Econ 2019;32:113–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-018-0718-8.

Hassan G, Mahmud S. Health Expenditures, Remittances, and Climate Vulnerability: Evidence from Bangladesh. Development Economics: Regional & Country Studies EJournal 2021. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3857411.

BP2MI. Data Penempatan dan Pelindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia Periode Januari 2025 2025. https://bp2mi.go.id/statistik-detail/data-penempatan-dan-pelindungan-pekerja-migran-indonesia-periode-januari-2025 (accessed March 5, 2025).

BPS-Indonesia. Cerita Data Statistik untuk Indonesia - Pekerja Migran Indonesia 2024. https://www.bps.go.id/api/publication/2024/12/20/9c05132ff1959947793274db/cerita-data-statistik-untuk-indonesia---pekerja-migran-indonesia.html (accessed March 5, 2025).

Rahman MS, Huang W-C, Toiba H, Putritamara JA, Nugroho TW, Saeri M. Climate change adaptation and fishers’ subjective well-being in Indonesia: Is there a link? Reg Stud Mar Sci 2023;63:103030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2023.103030.

Zheng H, Ma W. Click it and buy happiness: does online shopping improve subjective well-being of rural residents in China? Appl Econ 2021;53:4192–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.1897513.

Roodman D. Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. Stata J 2011;11:159–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X1101100202.

Zhu Z, Ma W, Leng C. ICT Adoption, Individual Income and Psychological Health of Rural Farmers in China. Appl Res Qual Life 2022;17:71–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09879-2.

Natanael Y, Ramdani Z, Azizah N, Fahmi I, Novanto Y. Indonesian Version of Satisfaction with Life Scale, a Psychometric Evaluation with Rasch Model. Psychological Thought 2024;17:82–102. https://doi.org/10.37708/psyct.v17i1.814.

Kusunose Y, Rignall KE. The long-term development impacts of international migration remittances for sending households: evidence from Morocco. Migr Dev 2018;7:412–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21632324.2018.1475383.

Adams RH. Remittances, household expenditure and investment in Guatemala. World Dev 2005;38:1626–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.03.003.

Osei-Gyebi S, Opoku A, Lipede MO, Kountchou LK. The effect of remittance inflow on savings in Nigeria: The role of financial inclusion. Cogent Soc Sci 2023;9. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2220599.

Rahman M. Gendering Migrant Remittances: Evidence from Bangladesh and the United Arab Emirates. International Migration 2013;51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2435.2012.00763.x.

Gröger A. Easy come, easy go? Economic shocks, labor migration and the family left behind. J Int Econ 2021;128:103409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2020.103409.

Bhandari P. Rural Households’ Allocation of Remittance Income in Agriculture in Nepal. Global Journal of Agricultural and Allied Sciences 2019;1:1–10. https://doi.org/10.35251/gjaas.2019.001.

Biyase M, Fisher B, Pretorius M. Remittances and subjective well-being: A static and dynamic panel approach to single-item and multi-item measures of happiness, 2020. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v18i6.917.

Petróczy DG. An alternative quality of life ranking on the basis of remittances. Socioecon Plann Sci 2021;78:101042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101042.

Segerstrom SC, Combs HL, Winning A, Boehm JK, Kubzansky LD. The happy survivor? Effects of differential mortality on life satisfaction in older age. Psychol Aging 2016;31 4:340–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000091.

Rahman MS, Huang W-C, Toiba H, Efani A. Does adaptation to climate change promote household food security? Insights from Indonesian fishermen. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology 2022;29:611–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2063433.

Calasanti TM, Carr DC, Homan PA, Coan V. Gender Disparities in Life Satisfaction after Retirement: The Role of Leisure, Family, and Finances. Gerontologist 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnab015.

Larsson JP, Thulin P. Independent by necessity? The life satisfaction of necessity and opportunity entrepreneurs in 70 countries. Small Business Economics 2018:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0110-9.

Haddad J, Chaaban J, Chalak A, Ghattas H. Does Income Class Affect Life Satisfaction? New Evidence from Cross-Country Microdata. Soc Sci 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060262.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.